Over nearly 25 years of Transformers product, Hasbro has tried to maintain a balance between coming up with new characters and concepts, and giving homages to characters and concepts that have come before. The first few years of the original line (roughly from '84-'86) are homaged especially often. When the Alternators line came out, there were apparently at least three main goals: 1) Create a line of toys that is entirely within a particular scale (in this case 1:24, which is commonly used for model cars). 2) Create a line of toys that are licensed by the actual automakers themselves, and therefore accurately resemble the vehicles they purport to turn into. 3) Create new forms for well-loved characters from the Generation One era.If you've clicked that Jazz link, or recognize the robot form of Shockblast as resembling this character I reviewed several months ago, you've already noticed that neither of these Alternator toys have the same name as their Generation One counterpart (neither did this one I reviewed before Transformer reviews were a regular weekly feature). Basically, what happened is that, with toys, a company can only continue to claim a trademark to a certain name so long as the name is actively used by the company. If a name is not in current use by one company, another company can use it on their own product. In the case of the name "Shockwave," another toy company currently had it on their own toy, rendering the name unavailable for Hasbro, and so the substitute name "Shockblast" had to be used. However, if the resemblance isn't enough to tell you that this toy is really supposed to be Shockwave, click on the picture of the robot mode above and check out the license plate (visible at the robot's toes). This situation has since been rectified, allowing current toys to use the "Shockwave" name once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment