With the recent revelation that now-former BotCon organizer Fun Publications will retain the license to run the official G.I. Joe convention (but not BotCon) for at least two more years, discussion has reignited as to whether Fun Publications' tenure with BotCon has been a net positive or a net negative. While I have tended to come down on the "net positive" side, I have always acknowledged that their tenure with the convention has long been marked by controversy. It is perhaps important to note that, whatever Fun Publications' faults, the end of their time with BotCon marks the end of an unprecedented tenure of stability for the convention, lasting 12 years. The early years of BotCon had their share of controversy, as well, without any guarantees of stability. Indeed, the first three BotCons were each organized by different people, and the difficulties surrounding BotCon 1996 were arguably the worst of them all....Perhaps the most positive aspect of BotCon 1996 was the exclusive toy that year, a repaint of the first Beast Wars Optimus Primal toy named Onyx Primal. But even Onyx's story is far from serene.
There's not a whole lot more to be said about Onyx Primal, who is largely forgotten today, but for those who remember those early BotCons, he represents the chaos and turmoil that marked his convention itself. Even with all of Fun Publications' problems, I still prefer having had them to the likelihood of not getting a dedicated official convention at all. We have come to take having BotCon for granted, and with Hasbro still playing coy about their future plans, it's clear that we can no longer assume that what was true in the past will remain true in the future.
*To be fair, the bio card that came with the retail Optimus Primal that used this same mold only had a less-than-informative quote, as well. But since the intention at the time was still that Primal was the same entity as G1 Optimus Prime, we already knew who he was, anyway....
No comments:
Post a Comment