data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4437c/4437cb9993d8c447062cb9a01f739f1767abc3f1" alt=""
With the recent revelation that now-former BotCon organizer Fun Publications will retain the license to run the official G.I. Joe convention (but
not BotCon) for at least two more years, discussion has reignited as to whether Fun Publications' tenure with BotCon has been a net positive or a net negative. While I have tended to come down on the "net positive" side, I have always acknowledged that their tenure with the convention has long been marked by controversy. It is perhaps important to note that, whatever Fun Publications' faults, the end of their time with BotCon marks the end of an unprecedented tenure of stability for the convention, lasting 12 years. The early years of BotCon had their share of controversy, as well, without any guarantees of stability. Indeed, the first three BotCons were
each organized by different people, and the difficulties surrounding
BotCon 1996 were arguably the worst of them all....
Perhaps the most positive aspect of BotCon 1996 was the exclusive toy that year, a repaint of the first Beast Wars Optimus Primal toy named Onyx Primal. But even Onyx's story is far from serene.